If I remember rightly, when I first launched this blog all manner of comments were accepted, including anonymous ones. After a while, when it became clear that Anonymous comments tended to be abusive or did not attempt to develop or discuss ideas in a balanced way, I switched off that option and now I rely on someone to have a Google account.
My view now is that I'm going to go a step further. I want this blog to be about having a political conversation, with other Greens, with others who have different political views and for people to have a conversation with me. One of the key aspects of having a conversation is knowing who you are talking to, so that is a new house rule in regards to the Comments.
There (has been) a time and a place for anonymity / avatars on blogs, but the way in which I want to have a conversation now is to do it on the record, with other people willing to do the same. If you want to be anonymous, or you post under a Google identity that says nothing other than the date it was created (often simultaneous to the comment...) then I'm highly unlikely to publish your part of the conversation.
For those that want to have open and frank discussions, there are message boards where you can either choose to be yourself or not. In the past, I've been an occasional anonymous contributor (although it didn't take too much detective work to know who I was), but it is not something I'd do now. My blog is something that is on the record, and I think that is how I'd like to conduct my online discussion.
There is an exception to this general rule I'd like to make clear. You might want to be anonymous to everyone else, but you can choose to email me alongside your comment at petercranie@greenparty.org.uk to introduce yourself. I'll then be more than happy to have that conversation with you, but will respect your right to remain anonymous to others.
As always, feedback on this gratefully received. I hope everyone has enjoyed some family time during this holiday season. I've got six days before I'm back at work and I intend to spend most of that with my family. Happy Hogmanay all!
27 December 2011
21 December 2011
Boycotting China - how it has gone
Readers with long memories will note that my new year's resolution in 2011 was to boycott Chinese goods, unless I could determine they were produced in a way that I felt was ethical (eg - trade union representation and ethical conditions of work). So how has it gone?
Firstly, I'll come clean where I have fallen down, through my own fault, on two occasions. Ben 10 figures (and pretty much everything else to do with that show) are manufactured in China. On one occasion, I'd promised my oldest son he could pick a toy (this is shortly after the birth of the youngest one), and he chose something I was supposed to be boycotting. On another occasion, I was buying replacement glasses (after a few smashes) and did not check. I got home to find out that I had bought something from China.
Other than those two episodes, I'm happy that I've achieved my objective which was to consciously choose not to buy Made in China goods. I don't want to re-run the "boycott" debate and whether it is a helpful term, which perhaps deserves another post in the new year. As best as possible, I'm going to continue to make that ethical choice in future. Dealing with a specific point raised in the comments back in January, what happens when I buy new electronic goods, next year or in the years that follow?
It may be simply unavoidable for a replacement device or electronic equipment to completely avoid dubious source materials or production. The only ethical choice will be to avoid consumption. Coltan sourced from the Democratic Republic of Congo almost certainly powers the laptop I'm writing on and the mobile phone I use. How many of us that have supported boycott campaigns (of Nestle for example) will continue to use products that clearly have as bad or worse backgrounds?
As a teenager, I boycotted South African goods in the era of apartheid. Consciously I will continue to avoid buying products from the USA, Zimbabwe, China and Israel. Sadly, Canada is likely to join that list due to its government position on the Kyoto treaty. I will also avoid (zealously) Nestle products and we have switched almost everything we do financially over to the Co-operative Group in the UK. The obvious criticism is that you end up avoiding buying anything - not actually a bad outcome if you are a member of an anti-consumerist party which fundamentally disagrees with our current economic system (and this is the subject of an upcoming post).
However, I want to end this post with a challenge for me and for the many of us for whom a simple "boycott" campaign is more about a "feelgood" factor for the person boycotting, rather than a consistent and ethically considered position.
Each weekday, I drive to work, car sharing with 2 others. As an alternative, the bus trip would be about 2.5 hours each way and on the two nights I work late, I would finish work after the last bus leaves. My diesel and my regular purchase of it supports an industry that is fundamentally damaging the planet. Not only that, the countries from which it is sourced are often those with dismal records on human rights and the repression of their own people. We are not in the financial position to afford an electric vehicle that could remove this dependence.
Most days in the last month, we've had the central heating on. The gas we purchase may well be sourced through Ecotricity, but it has to come from somewhere initially. Some of the countries that are the major producers (eg - Kazakstan) are far worse offenders than countries that I would otherwise boycott. Although we've had a wood burning stove installed in one room, there are times when it is too cold throughout the house to just use that alone.
So the challenge for all of when we talk about boycotts or ethical consumption is to avoid cherry picking and apply ethical standards consistently. This is not easy and something I hope to improve on in the coming year.
Firstly, I'll come clean where I have fallen down, through my own fault, on two occasions. Ben 10 figures (and pretty much everything else to do with that show) are manufactured in China. On one occasion, I'd promised my oldest son he could pick a toy (this is shortly after the birth of the youngest one), and he chose something I was supposed to be boycotting. On another occasion, I was buying replacement glasses (after a few smashes) and did not check. I got home to find out that I had bought something from China.
Other than those two episodes, I'm happy that I've achieved my objective which was to consciously choose not to buy Made in China goods. I don't want to re-run the "boycott" debate and whether it is a helpful term, which perhaps deserves another post in the new year. As best as possible, I'm going to continue to make that ethical choice in future. Dealing with a specific point raised in the comments back in January, what happens when I buy new electronic goods, next year or in the years that follow?
It may be simply unavoidable for a replacement device or electronic equipment to completely avoid dubious source materials or production. The only ethical choice will be to avoid consumption. Coltan sourced from the Democratic Republic of Congo almost certainly powers the laptop I'm writing on and the mobile phone I use. How many of us that have supported boycott campaigns (of Nestle for example) will continue to use products that clearly have as bad or worse backgrounds?
As a teenager, I boycotted South African goods in the era of apartheid. Consciously I will continue to avoid buying products from the USA, Zimbabwe, China and Israel. Sadly, Canada is likely to join that list due to its government position on the Kyoto treaty. I will also avoid (zealously) Nestle products and we have switched almost everything we do financially over to the Co-operative Group in the UK. The obvious criticism is that you end up avoiding buying anything - not actually a bad outcome if you are a member of an anti-consumerist party which fundamentally disagrees with our current economic system (and this is the subject of an upcoming post).
However, I want to end this post with a challenge for me and for the many of us for whom a simple "boycott" campaign is more about a "feelgood" factor for the person boycotting, rather than a consistent and ethically considered position.
Each weekday, I drive to work, car sharing with 2 others. As an alternative, the bus trip would be about 2.5 hours each way and on the two nights I work late, I would finish work after the last bus leaves. My diesel and my regular purchase of it supports an industry that is fundamentally damaging the planet. Not only that, the countries from which it is sourced are often those with dismal records on human rights and the repression of their own people. We are not in the financial position to afford an electric vehicle that could remove this dependence.
Most days in the last month, we've had the central heating on. The gas we purchase may well be sourced through Ecotricity, but it has to come from somewhere initially. Some of the countries that are the major producers (eg - Kazakstan) are far worse offenders than countries that I would otherwise boycott. Although we've had a wood burning stove installed in one room, there are times when it is too cold throughout the house to just use that alone.
So the challenge for all of when we talk about boycotts or ethical consumption is to avoid cherry picking and apply ethical standards consistently. This is not easy and something I hope to improve on in the coming year.
14 December 2011
General Election March 2012?
Given that today saw unemployment at its highest level since the last Conservative (led) government in 1994, inflation running at nearly 3% above the government target and the economy bumping along the bottom, it is a strange question to ask. I'll make clear that I don't think it is likely, but I do think that we should consider this possibility and be adequately prepared.
Yesterday there were three opinion polls, two showing the Tories drawing level with Labour and the final one showing them 2 points ahead in the polls. This is a knee jerk public reaction to Cameron's use of the UK veto at the emergency EU summit. It has been popular. As a result there has been some chatter online from some Tories and some writers suggesting that a spring election should be considered.
So how could this come about:
- Splits in the coalition over Europe and other issues continue and Cameron eventually says he has to call an election because the Lib Dems are sabotaging the coalition (or they leave it)
- The Tories are the first off the blocks to offer a referendum on the EU in their manifesto (probably a 3 way one similar to the SNP offer in Scotland)
- Ed Miliband continues to struggle as Labour leader, and will be seen as untested and unelectable by the public, not to mention unsupported by many in his own party
- Cameron would be convinced he could mop up the anti-EU vote of the hard right (UKIP got 3% in 2010, potentially costing the Tories 10 seats)
The outcome that Lib Dems lose seats to the Tories in the south as Labour voters desert them and don't vote tactically (a swing of 5% to the Tories would give them 20 seats). All else being equal, this would lead to a Tory majority of 15+ and a term that runs to 2017, with Scottish independence "Yes" vote potentially locking the opposition parties out for a generation.
Even for an outside possibility we Greens must prepare for this possibility and do so urgently. Caroline Lucas would have a strong chance of retaining our seat in Brighton Pavilion despite what will be a no doubt fearsome assault by the red and blue parties but what would be crucial is the rest of the national party mobilising to stand as many candidates as possible, and that means running selections in January and raising the multitude of £500 deposits we'll need to contest more than half of the 650 constituencies.
Let's keep an eye on the situation for now.
Yesterday there were three opinion polls, two showing the Tories drawing level with Labour and the final one showing them 2 points ahead in the polls. This is a knee jerk public reaction to Cameron's use of the UK veto at the emergency EU summit. It has been popular. As a result there has been some chatter online from some Tories and some writers suggesting that a spring election should be considered.
So how could this come about:
- Splits in the coalition over Europe and other issues continue and Cameron eventually says he has to call an election because the Lib Dems are sabotaging the coalition (or they leave it)
- The Tories are the first off the blocks to offer a referendum on the EU in their manifesto (probably a 3 way one similar to the SNP offer in Scotland)
- Ed Miliband continues to struggle as Labour leader, and will be seen as untested and unelectable by the public, not to mention unsupported by many in his own party
- Cameron would be convinced he could mop up the anti-EU vote of the hard right (UKIP got 3% in 2010, potentially costing the Tories 10 seats)
The outcome that Lib Dems lose seats to the Tories in the south as Labour voters desert them and don't vote tactically (a swing of 5% to the Tories would give them 20 seats). All else being equal, this would lead to a Tory majority of 15+ and a term that runs to 2017, with Scottish independence "Yes" vote potentially locking the opposition parties out for a generation.
Even for an outside possibility we Greens must prepare for this possibility and do so urgently. Caroline Lucas would have a strong chance of retaining our seat in Brighton Pavilion despite what will be a no doubt fearsome assault by the red and blue parties but what would be crucial is the rest of the national party mobilising to stand as many candidates as possible, and that means running selections in January and raising the multitude of £500 deposits we'll need to contest more than half of the 650 constituencies.
Let's keep an eye on the situation for now.
13 December 2011
Methane, CO2 and a Call to Action
Bright Green has a good posting that you should read before this one, but in summary, a large release of methane is really, really bad news for us as a global society and for many of the species that inhabit our planet.
I've just added a CO2 counter to this blog that is a reminder to me and hopefully to the reader about the single most pressing issue we are faced with. The banking crisis, the Euro zone problems and budget cuts are going to pale into insignificance if we face an uncontrollable rise in global temperatures over the coming decades.
The social issues we are faced with right now matter immensely to each of us. We are seeing people consigned to an unemployed future before they have reached their 20s. Our most talented young people are being saddled with lifetime debt before they even start applying for jobs. Those of us lucky enough to be in employment are clear that the coming years are going to be very tough. We will have to fight our corner to protect jobs while our national government avoids implementing simple policies like the Tobin Tax, that could make a hugely positive difference.
What I am convinced about is that we are talking about two sides of the same problem. We have a dominant global free market ideology that has delivered development and wealth, but has concentrated into elites around the world, instead of being shared for the common good. The excesses of this system have led to environmental degradation, distain for human rights (by us about regimes like Uzbekistan) and have established a system that will fight to protect itself despite a gradual death spiral caused by huge amounts of global debt.
In the face of that we have emerging bottom up movements like Occupy. We've seen and are seeing people campaign for freedom, respect for human rights and the chance of real democracy around the world. The internet has enabled some tremendous advances and has for the first time in history given the many the chance to quickly organise against elites, expose hypocrisy and challenge injustice. We are living at an exciting time but also an immensely challenging time and a new and fairer way of life will evolve out of the current mess we find ourselves in. I hope and believe that it will do so quickly. The methane and CO2 levels mean we face a deadline for action, but we don't know exactly when it is.
Each person will have their own path and I firmly believe that for me, the Green Party is the best possible way of effecting political change in Britain and in Europe. The national appeal this month is asking for our support. It will get mine and I hope if you are reading this, you will consider donating too.
Thank you.
I've just added a CO2 counter to this blog that is a reminder to me and hopefully to the reader about the single most pressing issue we are faced with. The banking crisis, the Euro zone problems and budget cuts are going to pale into insignificance if we face an uncontrollable rise in global temperatures over the coming decades.
The social issues we are faced with right now matter immensely to each of us. We are seeing people consigned to an unemployed future before they have reached their 20s. Our most talented young people are being saddled with lifetime debt before they even start applying for jobs. Those of us lucky enough to be in employment are clear that the coming years are going to be very tough. We will have to fight our corner to protect jobs while our national government avoids implementing simple policies like the Tobin Tax, that could make a hugely positive difference.
What I am convinced about is that we are talking about two sides of the same problem. We have a dominant global free market ideology that has delivered development and wealth, but has concentrated into elites around the world, instead of being shared for the common good. The excesses of this system have led to environmental degradation, distain for human rights (by us about regimes like Uzbekistan) and have established a system that will fight to protect itself despite a gradual death spiral caused by huge amounts of global debt.
In the face of that we have emerging bottom up movements like Occupy. We've seen and are seeing people campaign for freedom, respect for human rights and the chance of real democracy around the world. The internet has enabled some tremendous advances and has for the first time in history given the many the chance to quickly organise against elites, expose hypocrisy and challenge injustice. We are living at an exciting time but also an immensely challenging time and a new and fairer way of life will evolve out of the current mess we find ourselves in. I hope and believe that it will do so quickly. The methane and CO2 levels mean we face a deadline for action, but we don't know exactly when it is.
Each person will have their own path and I firmly believe that for me, the Green Party is the best possible way of effecting political change in Britain and in Europe. The national appeal this month is asking for our support. It will get mine and I hope if you are reading this, you will consider donating too.
Thank you.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)